Conventions for Rails applications
The majority of GOV.UK applications are built using Ruby on Rails and over the years we have created a lot them. Along the way we’ve used a variety of patterns and conventions. We aim for GOV.UK apps to be consistent in their implementation with differences in domain logic. However, it isn’t practical to evolve all apps at the same pace so there can be differences in approaches used.
This document serves as a guide to the current conventions and preferences. It is intended to serve as a guide for teams creating new applications and for teams iterating older ones. If you are creating a new application do also consult the guides on setting up a new Rails application and how to name an application.
Non-Rails GOV.UK applications may still benefit from these conventions. Consider applying them if they do not conflict with existing conventions in an adopted framework.
GOV.UK’s use of Rails is intended to be consistent with the conventions of the framework itself and we intend to embrace developments and deprecations from the framework. Where GOV.UK apps differ from Rails conventions (such as using the RSpec testing framework) these are intended to be consistent with common industry practices.
Use GOV.UK supporting Gems
GOV.UK have published a number of gems that help achieve common needs across Ruby / Rails applications:
- gds-api-adapters - provides common patterns to communicate between GOV.UK applications
- gds-sso - integration with signon for user and application authentication
- govuk_app_config - provides common configuration for applications such as logging, error handling and metric reporting
- govuk_message_queue_consumer - provides a consistent means to work with the the RabbitMQ queue that the Publishing API broadcasts to
- govuk_publishing_components - provides a framework for embedding common GOV.UK interface components and creating your own application specific ones
- govuk_sidekiq - Provides common configuration for using sidekiq with GOV.UK infrastructure
- govuk_schemas - Provides helper utilities for interfacing with govuk-content-schemas
- govuk_test - Provides configuration and dependencies for headless browser testing
- plek - Utility tool to access determine base URLs for GOV.UK applications for the current environment
- rubocop-govuk - Provides GOV.UK linting rules for Ruby, Rails, RSpec and Rake
- scss-lint-govuk - Provides linting for SCSS files according to GDS conventions
- slimmer - Provides consistent templating for apps that serve content on the www.gov.uk host
Using these helps maintain consistency across the programme and enables common iterations to be pushed out. It is encouraged that gems are iterated or issues filed (example) when apps need to vary from conventions introduced by these gems.
For key-value datastore access (such as queues or distributed caches) Redis should be used. Typically a Redis datastore will not be shared between applications, for queue-based communication between applications we have precedent for using RabbitMQ via the Bunny gem.
Background job processing
The preferred approach for background job processing is to use ActiveJob with Sidekiq with the govuk_sidekiq gem providing configuration. ActiveJob is preferred due to it’s closer integration of Rails components (such as ActionMailer).
Scheduled background jobs for applications should also make use of Sidekiq, where sidekiq-scheduler is the conventional choice to achieve this.
GOV.UK Notify is the preferred approach for sending email. The mail-notify gem is conventionally used to integrate Notify with ActionMailer. There is further documentation on how GOV.UK applications use Notify.
The preferred framework for testing Rails applications is rspec-rails where we aim to adhere to the project’s conventions. rubocop-govuk provides a linting configuration for RSpec. For mocking and test doubles you should use the provided rspec-mocks framework.
When working with rspec-rails we prefer merging the spec_helper.rb and
rails_helper.rb files into a single spec_helper.rb to avoid the
complexities of two configuration files. We also choose to specify
--require spec_helper in a
to avoid prefixing every test with
Common tools used with RSpec are:
- webmock gem to stub HTTP requests - for stubbing communication between GOV.UK applications gds-api-adapters provides a library of helper methods that are preferred to manual stubbing;
- SimpleCov for monitoring code coverage;
- factory_bot_rails for providing fixtures/test data;
- Climate Control gem for modifying environment variables within tests;
ActiveSupport::Testing::TimeHelpersfor time manipulation.
Embrace 12 factor conventions
GOV.UK Rails applications aim to follow 12 factor conventions. These should manifest in your Rails application with practices such as:
- environmental configuration done by environment variables, for example using
ENV["DATABASE_URL"]over hardcoding the production database configuration;
- close parity between development and production environments, for example using PostgreSQL in all environments - as opposed to SQLite for development and PostgreSQL for production;
- avoiding, where possible, the need for additional configuration on the serving machine, for example needing additional Nginx rules to serve requests.
Inject secrets with environment variables
The conventional place to store secrets for a GOV.UK Rails application is
config/secrets.yml. All production secrets should be populated with an
environment variable; for dev and test environments it’s preferred to leave
a usable dummy default if an actual secret isn’t needed
We haven’t migrated to using the encrypted
introduced in Rails 5.2. This approach presents us
with a few problems, most notably that we run our apps in Rails
“production” environment in numerous places (integration, staging,
production) and need different secrets for them.
api_only mode for API projects
For applications that do not serve requests to a web browser you should configure the Rails application to be API only, this simplifies Rails by removing unnecessary functionality. If you need to add a web browser interface to an API application you should consider creating a distinct frontend application (for example: email-alert-frontend and email-alert-api).
Editing of microcopy by non-developers
When it is intended for non-developers to edit microcopy in an application it is
conventional to use Rails Internationalization (I18n) to abstract
the copy outside of the application code. We use this even when an application
is only in English. These files are stored in
/config/locales as per Rails
convention. You should only use these files for accessing copy and not
for any application configuration.
GOV.UK Rails applications should anticipate failure and do so gracefully. This happens automatically, to a degree, on GOV.UK frontend applications but not on admin applications where there is more granular control over error responses. GOV.UK Rails applications should be configured to provide GOV.UK branded error responses. Content Publisher provides an example of implementing this with the GOV.UK admin layout.
Organising your code
Organising code in a Rails application is frequently a source of debate and
confusion, particularly as to what code belongs in the
/app directory and
what belongs in the
/lib directory. We aim to follow what appears
to be the prevalent convention where:
/appis used for:
/libis used for:
- classes that don’t logically fit into an app directory
- complex business logic for the application, (for example, link expansion in the Publishing API)
- Rake tasks
GOV.UK Rails applications should avoid creating an
/app/lib directory, as this
causes confusion with the prevalent
Configuration for applications, typically YAML files, should live in the
Documenting your decisions
It’s conventional to create a
/docs directory in GOV.UK Rails applications to
store application documentation (which is typically linked to from the readme).
We aim for well tested Rails applications that provide a good degree of coverage and provide assurances that an application is operating correctly. We value test suites that are fast to run, easy to read and test things consistently at different abstractions (unit, integration and functional).
When testing Rails applications from the perspective of an end user it is conventional to use RSpec Rails’ feature specs (new applications should use the more modern equivalent system specs) via govuk_test’s Capybara configuration.
GOV.UK have adopted the Future Learn readable feature test approach to writing feature tests in RSpec. This offers a similar level of readability of a cucumber test, without the difficulties in identifying the code used to perform the test.